...
The status will show as ‘Rejected|Code Not approved’
...
A few GitHub FAQS
Q1. After giving Admin access to StagingPro Git repository, I see some autogenerated code branches e.g. Productione347c1, so should I keep the names as it is?
A1. Yes, that is correct. These environment branch names are autogenerated and required for code commit tracking. Please do not delete or rename these branches as it will affect the GitHub integration.
Q2. What is the purpose of developer branches?
A2. As best practice, developers are given their own branches so they can commit their codes to their own branch at the first instance, or for more frequent code commits at the developers convenience without affecting the environment branch.
Q3. Are there any benefits to using a developer branch over a more typical git feature branch (e.g. feature/TICKET-description-of-the-change)?
A3. Yes indeed! The developer can commit to their branch first. Once the task is complete, they can merge the code from their branch to the environment branch. If many developers are working on a common task, they can commit codes to each of their individual branches without affecting the other developer branches. And can merge their code easily.
Q4. What purpose does the Main/Master branch serve in a typical setup?
A4. Master branch is generally used as a buffer branch and is the default branch while creating a repo in GitHub. This master ‘buffer’ branch can be left as it is. Instead use the autogenerated active branches that is automatically (with a name such as Productione347c1) created during your GitHub integration and linking process.